Across The Touchline
A blog all about football And Long Live Billy Connolly!
Monday, 3 February 2025
Why are Teams That Get Promoted Immediately Relegated?
Friday, 31 January 2025
Across the "Digital" Touchline: Fantasy Football *Week 23*
The defence was shocking...
Monday, 27 January 2025
Could Teams Look at Breaking Rules if They Are Not at Risk of Relegation?
FFP. PSR.
What is FFP? What is PSR?
What punishments have been implemented for breaking the rules?
Should teams look at breaking the rules if they are not at risk of relegation?
Friday, 24 January 2025
Across the "Digital" Touchline: Fantasy Football *Week 22*
Catch up time...
There was a round of mid-week games for week 21 of Premier League Fantasy Football. Let's do a little back track on that week and then we will get into week 22 as titled.
Game week 22 starts with a bit of a slump.
Player of the week
Monday, 20 January 2025
Why Is The New England Manager Not English?
At the end of the 2024 European Championship Gareth Southgate stepped down as the men's England manager. The big question that football fans had up and down our country was, "who is going to take his place?" Most of us are looking at candidates such as Eddie Howe of Newcastle, the crazy outside chance that Pep Guardiola leaves Manchester City to take his first international role or would Lee Carsley continue and go from an interim manager to full time manager. How many people saw us going for Thomas Tuchel, another non-English manager for the third time. We've done it before with the late Sven-Goran Eriksson and the Italian Fabio Capello. Both are excellent football men yet for whatever reason it just didn't work for either of them in that role.
Here we're going to get into why I think we have gone international again at this moment in time and why I think it's not really a bad idea. Firstly, there will be people all over the country complaining that this role should always be filled with an Englishman. Real proud of their country people. England this, England that, three lions tattooed on their body and all that. Bollocks! Forgetting their sat on a Swedish sofa from IKEA, probably watching a Japanese TV, eating American cuisine and drinking German or Belgium beer. I don't understand this mindset and there will be a lot out there that have it. Probably too much ego. I'm proud to be English. Not too much and not too little. At the end of the day my proudness of my nationality doesn't really make me make a choice on who I thought should have been next. And at the end of the day if we win a trophy; whether it's the World Cup or Euros; the nationality of the manager will be forgotten.
Without further ado lets get into it. There's 5 or 6 English managers that probably had a strong-medium chance of being in the conversation of replacing Gareth Southgate and these are my opinions why going with a foreign manager rather than English.
First off, lets remember who we're talking about here. These men are all Premier League managers. They're no cowboys when it comes to managing and coaching football teams. In the best league in the world. Some are more experienced than others but either way they obviously have immense knowledge on the game and how it is played.
Gary O'Neil. Yeah, I agree with what you're thinking. We're talking about the senior men's England manager. He may be quite a few down the line in the bookies odds but lets cover all bases here. Maybe you'll see where I'm going with this. O'Neil joins Bournemouth in August 2022. For the year that he is there, his team are struggling towards the bottom of the league table. Yes, they've recently been promoted and it can take a good while to become an established Premier League team, yet they were promoted with Eddie Howe in 2012. Not like they've only been there for a year or two. With O'Neil in charge they scrape by and stay in the league. If you watch Bournemouth play, what was their identity and style of play under O'Neil? He is sacked in June 2023. Andoni Iraola replaces him not long after. Now, Iraola doesn't hit the ground running with the south coast team. You see it every now and again a team take off and go on a good run when they change managers. This didn't happen for the Spaniard. Maybe the changes in style of play and philosophies were done too much too soon. We don't know but his start wouldn't have been how he wanted it to go. Irrespectively, they dodged relegation stayed in the Premier League for at least another year. Still Iraola got into a position that quite a few managers have been in where it looked like he might be a loss away from losing his job himself. Nevertheless, look at Bournemouth now. A year to 18 months later. Yes they've made a few transfers in and out but has their team changed that much. Bournemouth have an identity, they are now capable of beating most teams in the league, they can give the big 6 teams a game and sometimes nick a point or even a win, and most of all there's not chance they're getting relegated any time soon. Not this season anyway.
Next we're going to stick with Gary O'Neil. He has done it again. A very similar story at Wolverhampton Wanderers. Before his arrival, Wolves had Nuno Espirito Santo, Bruno Lage and Julen Lopetegui. They were constantly in the 11th to 16th section of the Premier League table. In my opinion, they were very rarely in a position where they looked like getting relegated. Yeah they might of had dips in for and that's why they have swapped managers a bit in the last 4 years. I don't think I have really thought Wolves are going down here. O'Neil comes in August 2023. Similarly, only spends about a year in his role. Just over a year here. When O'Neil gets settled in his role in the midlands club and you watch his team, what is their style of play? Once again, just like at Bournemouth, there's not much identity and if someone asks you how a Gary O'Neil team plays, how would you answer it? At the start of this season I think there's a point to make that Wolves have been the worst team in the league. Even the newly promoted clubs Ipswich, Southampton and Leicester City have shown me more. They can't score a goal, they concede the sloppiest of goals. Some might say, look at who they have played in the first 10 games. It's no excuse. You have to play everyone by the end of the season. Twice. My point is at least have a way of playing. When you come up against the giants in the league, be hard to beat. Give them a game. I think it is a perfect example of English coaches being a bit lazy and not having a style of play and key points throughout the game and in certain scenarios in a game. With the squad and starting XI Wolves have they are not a bottom 5 team. I know some big teams have gone down like Newcastle United, West Ham United and the mighty Leeds United. All 3 never had the worst teams in the league but this is football. Wolves have brought in Victor Pereira and I can see them now kicking on slightly and beating relegation.
The mighty Steven Gerrard did a good job a Glasgow Rangers. It was a good job and not much more than that. How many big teams are there in that league? Some might come back and say you've got teams like Dundee United and Aberdeen. When was the last time they won the league above Celtic and Rangers? It's a 50/50 up there. Gerrard did a good job in winning Rangers first title in 10 years after they were relegated and the promoted again yet can it really be hailed that much? It's nothing like Claudio Ranieri winning the league win Leicester City in 2016. The Liverpudlian goes from Rangers to Aston Villa in November 2021. A big team in the Premier League. Has he got that job on merit or because of his name and his playing career. You can decide that. In his time at Villa I don't think he did such a bad job. There's a style of play there. Encouraging playing through the inside channels so there can be a strong use of wing backs attacking on both flanks. Also, being compact and solid in a 4-3-3 and hard to beat. There's something there and it was an entertaining watch with something to analyse. The former England captain was replaced by Unai Emery in November 2022. Almost exactly a year after being appointed. Now look at them. With a couple of seasons under his belt at the midlands club they've qualified for the Champions League. Some teams when they qualify for the Champions League for the first time in a while, they end up being there to make up the numbers. And for the fans its a great experience of maybe being able to see their club playing against a Real Madird or AC Milan. wow. Not Villa. Not a Unai Emery team. Not only did they qualify for the competition for the first time since it has been called the Champions League and not the UEFA Cup. Look at the difference from when Gerrard was in charge, in the bottom half of the Premier League. He slowly brought them up the league but they were nowhere near the team that they are now. Once again, going from an English manager to an overseas manager and there's a big difference in the teams trajectory.
Scott Parker at Fulham is slightly different. He did a brilliant job at the west London club and got them promoted to the Premier League from the Championship in 2020. He joined Fulham as manager in 2019 and took over a pretty good Championship side. Unfortunately, that's what they were. A Championship side. Once they got promoted Parker struggled to grind out many results which resulted in his departure. He did make quite a few hints in his public interviews that changes need to be made by the people upstairs and basically telling them they need to put their hands in their pockets to invest in the squad. Basically trying to suggest that this current squad is not good enough to stay in the top league. He was probably right as they more or less went straight back down. With the Englishman's departure, in came Marco Silva in July 2021. The Portuguese coach is still in charge at the cottage. Probably because he has a decent style of play that has shown the owners that he can take this team forward. They haven't exactly heavily invested but a few decent signings have been made over the last few years. 4 years later; surprise, surprise; they are no where near relegation and are becoming an established Premier League team. Even though, like Steven Gerrard at Aston Villa, Scott Parker started off strongly at Fulham, for what it's worth he has shown that the team he had had potential. Another coach came in; once again a foreign manager; and took them to the next level.
Maybe you're seeing the similarities in the points I am making. English manager, average team, either does badly and struggles to gets results or can't take the team to the next level, a foreign/overseas coach is appointed and a year or two later the club is succeeding.
Another English coach that makes this point for me is Graham Potter at Brighton Hove Albion. In this list of English managers I think it's only Gary O'Neil that has more or less failed from that start. Graham Potter took over at Brighton in 2019 when they had been in the Premier League for a few seasons after gaining promotion in 2016 under the management of Chris Hughton. The Seagulls did well beating relegation for quite a few years. They were right down there but essentially did well enough each season to stay up. Never really did a bad job at Albion. They got to a stage where they didn't look like getting relegated. For most Seagull fans, this won't have been enough. In September 2022, Potter jumps ship and feels the pull of one of the big six sides and joins Chelsea. To me this was a very similar sight to David Moyse going from Everton to Manchester United. Similarly, for both of them, it looked like they were not cut out to manage a big big club. Whether they were just not respected enough by the players at their respective clubs. Maybe the pressure of having to win every week got to them. Maybe doing certain things that worked in their previous roles just didn't work at a different club. Not long after, still in September of 2022, in steps Roberto De Zerbi. Like most, I have to admit I'd never heard of him before. But from the way he got that side playing maybe I should have known who he was. Brighton shot up the table. They never looked like winning the league but started to ask questions of the big clubs. Once again, similar if not the same scenario. English manager can only take the club to a certain level and a foreign manager comes in and takes the club to the next level. This time an Italian coach. From the outside the club seems to be run exeptionally well. It might be up there with Brentford on how they do their business. Bring players in for cheap, move them on for a profit. I don't think they mind being a feeder club as long as the fans are entertained and happy. Maybe the next step for Brighton is going to be a big one, now they are flirting with the European places, can they really get into the Champions League. As De Zerbi left in May 2024, the Brighton top dogs brought in a German coach. A young one at that too. Fabian Hurzeler, 31 years of age. Got to be one of the youngest coaches to ever coach in the Premier League, right? (Someone should look that up) So to me that shows that Brighton would rather take a chance on a young; very young; coach, than an experienced English coach because they want to get to that next level, and as you can see not many English coaches take clubs to the next level.
My next one is kind of a hypothetical one. Eddie Howe at Newcastle has done a fantastic job. They were flirting with relegation for a few season. They has their problems with ownership plans with Mike Ashley and the Sports Direct connections. There didn't seem to be much investment going into the club, especially to improve the squad. With all this going on behind the scenes and the take over from the Saudi Investment Group, Howe's team has progresses. However, I also think this could be a similar pattern that I have repeatedly explained. I honestly think that if a half decent foreign manager with a philosophy and game plan came into Eddie Howe's role, they would be consistently a Champions League team. That squad when fully fit and in form is better than Manchester United, Tottenham Hotspurs, and maybe challenges Chelsea. I do wonder from time to time if this would be true. I'd never say I want to see someone lose their job yet it's just a "what if" type of thought. I just think that side is under achieving; maybe because of inconsistencies throughout the season; and should be higher in the table than it currently is year or year out.
To be honest, it baffles me that Lee Carsley never seemed to be taken seriously as a candidate for the vacant men's senior manager role. If you look at what he's done a the U20 and U21 role. He ended up taking his U21 team to the U21 Euros and winning the whole thing. The first time we had ever done that. Look at what Spain did this summer and who was in charge while they won the Euros. Luis de la Fuente went from coaching the Spanish U21 team for around 5 years to then managing the Spanish senior team and leading them to victory at his first time of asking in a major international tournament. It's the same story in Argentina. Lionel Scaloni. Argentina U20 coach, becomes the senior team's manager and wins a major tournament at his first time of asking. Yeah he had another Lionel that might of helped him do that but you get the point. It was England's first Euros win at that level since 1984. Carsley made it quite clear in his interviews that he had a strong suspicion that he wasn't going to be given the role and also made it evident in a couple of his team selections, for example in his second game in charge not starting a recognised centre forward. He must of thought "fuck it, I'm here lets make this most of this ride." I wonder if he knew Thomas Tuchel was coming in, or just that it wasn't going to be him.
I mean look at where our last manager came from. Gareth Southgate was also our U21 manager after he left the Middlesborough job. He may not of done exactly what Scaloni or de la Fuente did and gone all the way in a major tournament for their country but he did a fantastic job and made the nation proud. All these people were calling for his job years ago. I was surrounded by it. The style of play wasn't amazing. At points I was raging with frustration watching how his players were playing. Whether it was overly cautious like in the 2024 Euros or our game management was shocking in the 2018 World Cup, I still think he brought the team together fantastically and also the nation came together for the summer. Remember the golden generation, and the stories we hear now how certain players would sit on certain tables to eat their meals. You had players like Wayne Rooney, John Terry, Steven Gerrard and Gary Neville going to war all season against each other then unable to leave that behind when meeting up for England duty. You don't get that any more. A lot of the England boys all seem to be best mates with someone in the England squad that doesn't even play for the same club. I feel that's partly down to Southgate and his coaching staff. Also partly down to social media bring the players closer together I'll admit. But there seems to be a lot less hostility between the England group now. (And we don't like hostility now, do we John. No we don't Harold.) The point is in 2016 when Southgate takes over, if you'd have been told in the next 4 major tournaments we're going to go 'semi final - final - quarter final - final' you would never have believed it. Before Southgate we hadn't been to a semi final since 1990, and that was only the second time we'd done it since winning it in '66. He's just gone and done it 3 out of 4 major tournaments. Golden generation my arse.
So out of this list of English managers, who can't either struggle to coach the biggest teams in the Premier League, or cant that their team to the next level who would you choose? Or would you go foreign and when we win something forget all about your own pride felt, English only morals?
Friday, 17 January 2025
Across The "Digital" Touchline: Fantasy Football *week 21*
What a perfectly brilliant time to start a blog about a Premier League fantasy football team. Week 21. Half way through the season. Not only is half the half way stage of the season, there’s a weekend of third round FA Cup fixtures this weekend. Not one Premier League game.
Again, don’t forget to like this post and subscribe to the blog if you haven’t already.
Here we can talk pointless opinions. Unless your team is right up there in the overall league, and you're in a chance of winning the prize, fantasy football is pretty pointless. But it's great to do as a challenge and a talking point. (What even is the prize for winning Premier League fantasy football. Is there only a prize or finishing first, or do second and third get something too? Someone should check on that)
My fantasy team started off bang average. I feel the first 10 weeks are so hard to scope and you have to get very lucky if you get a decent 11-15 players that get you loads of points to start with. I am involved in 5 different leagues. After the first few game weeks my team was bottom half of each league. Around 10th out of 15-18 teams. It was nice to know my team was sh*t, but not the sh*test.
My first feeling was getting Erling Haaland in the team and still being able to field 14 more decent players. With Haaland being about 15M means that if you pick him he has to deliver bags of points. I started with him and even though at the start he was scoring, the points return didn't justify the price tag. After the points weren't rolling in from him alone, I quickly realised selling him and being able to use the cash on upgrading 3-4 other players was a much better plan.
Haaland was out and at the time Mohammed Salah was a million or two cheaper. I also brought in Bukayo Saka, giving me a Midfield 5 of Mohammed Salah, Bukayo Saka, Cole Palmer, Brian Mbuemo at Brentford and Morgan Rodgers of Aston Villa. Not too shabby. Since having these 5 in the heart of the team my team has risen through all 5 leagues I am involved in.
Even though I don't think right now I am in much of a position to give advice, I'm going to anyway. Having a strong midfield to build around is the way to go in my opinion. What else in your team would you really build around. It's almost like the spine of the team, only this is horizontal on the team sheet and not vertical as the normal spine of the team is.
As I've just said, I think the most important element to building a decent point scoring team is the midfield. After that I think having a settled back 3 or 4 in defence is the next thing to decide. In my opinion selecting wing backs; left or right; is the way to go. Obviously, all defenders will pick up points for a clean sheet, yet wing backs are obviously more likely to pick up extra points for a goal or assist. Yes centre backs can score goals and get assist but it is a lot less likely. Apart from corners or advanced wide free kicks, when else to centre backs score goals. So why would you pick a centre back over a wing back. The 4 decent defenders I have right now are Julian Timber, Antonee Robinson, Aina from Nottingham Forest and the youngster Lewis Hall from Newcastle.
My fifth defender is Ben Johnson from Ipswich. Literally because how often does your third substitute get involved. So why spend more than the minimum amount on that player who plays regularly.
To be honest, I'll admit a mistake I made with Aina. Probably like most football fans, I've been expecting Nottingham Forest to drop off at any point. I thought it would happen about 5/6 game weeks ago. So I transferred him for Pervis Estupinan at Brighton. They had a very easy run of games at the time. All level 2 difficulty games. He did nothing for me so I had to bite the bullet at swap them back. Probably cost me something like £0.3 as Aina's price tag had improved over time.
Up top, I think you've just got to go with the flow. Which forwards are in form? Who is scoring goals at that time? I would probably look at the top forward you can afford and see if they are likely to score goals and get assists that month. As I said earlier, I started with Erling Haaland. I think most people did as I looked at the percentage owned stats and I'm sure at one point it was 75%+. Of late it has lowered and lowered over time due to Manchester City's lack of form. I'm sure it will be back some time in the near future. Class is permanent and all that.
Concentrating on the other forwards I started the season with. I actually had Joao Pedro and Kai Havertz. I thought and still think for his game value Joao Pedro is a fantastic steal. He can be a back up on the bench and can also start and bring in valuable points. As he got injured for a few weeks earlier in the season I sold him and I have very recently bought him back. His replacement at the time was Liam Delap at Ipswich. Again, a cheap striker that every now and again chips in with a goal or assist. At the time Ipswich were still on their high of promotion. They may not have won a tonne of games yet showed some solid performances to justify their back to back promotions. Raul Jiminez from Fulham made it into my team for a few weeks. He had scored a few goals for his club on consecutive weeks, and as soon as I brought him into my team his goal scoring streak dried up. Typical.
Again, sometimes you can look at a clubs up coming fixtures and see they are all level 2 difficulty. Doing this lead me to buying Nicolas Jackson. What a massive waste of time and bad decision that turned out to be. Did nothing for me and he was out. In came Alexander Isak and a few weeks earlier after Jiminez also failed me, the kiwi Chris Wood. I haven't looked back since. A front three of Wood, Isak and Joao Pedro seems to be the way to go at the minute. Since I've had my fantastic midfield and these three in the forward positions, I have shot up all 5 of my leagues. I'm in third place in 4 of them and second in the fifth. Things are looking up.
Last but not least, the goal keepers. There’s only two of them. A decision to make is whether I was going to spread money on both or put more money into one of the GKs and only spend the least amount possible on a keeper who plays. I’ve never thought of having one of the most expensive goal keepers in the game. For example, David Raya, Alisson or Ederson. It seems too much money for a position that never really produces much more than 6 points and also relies too much on clean sheets in a time when clean sheets seem so hard to predict.
I started with Dean Henderson as my starting number 1 with Lukasz Fabianski as sub. The West Ham cat has been a constant in my team all season long. He’s cheap, plays most games now and is a decent back up. I quickly changed my mind on my starting goal keeper to Matz Sels. Nottingham Forest have stunned me this season. I’m still shocked they haven’t dropped off so he will stay as my starting number 1 spot until they start losing. Maybe they will, maybe they won’t.
This is all opinion and in the grand scheme of things is pretty pointless unless your team is doing extremely well in the overall league. There’s no right or wrong answers for team line ups and if any Premier League fantasy football content creator says they know the answers they’re lying.
This is all about creating conversation and sharing opinions. If you have any opinions on how good or/and bad my ideas are let me know in the comments. Also, don’t be scared to share your ideas and your teams.
Tuesday, 14 January 2025
Is Chris Wood a better all round number 9 than Erling Haaland?
Before you misunderstand and think I’m trying to make the suggestion that Chris Wood is a better goal scorer than Erling Haaland, I’m not. I said all round number 9.
Some might say that it’s easy or easier to say this as the Kiwi is in the form of his life right now. With Nottingham Forest sitting 3rd in the Premier League, Wood (33) has netted 12 times in 20 games so far this season.
With a fantastic first half of the season, the all white is well on his way to his most prolific scoring season in his career so far. With 12 in 20 so far this campaign, and his highest scoring season being 14, surely he will beat his best. Now one thing I’m really not going to compare is Chris Wood’s scoring record alongside Erling Haaland’s, so the goal scoring stats end there.
As we are not talking stats here, I am going to make this discussion about the players attributes. If you're going to be picky and pedantic there are probably hundreds of small slight attributes that make up the number 9 position. Over the years we have seen many different number 9s. You've got a small number 9 like Jermaine Defoe that is more likely to rely on his pace, agility and the ball on the floor most of the time. You have Alan Shearer, a bit of a bigger and stronger physique who could play well with his back to goal. He could use his strength to physically come up against centre halves and shrug them off and spin in behind. Being a bit taller he didn't mind a cross into the box to get his head on the end of. Maybe less pace but his positioning, decision making and well timed runs never went unnoticed. Then we have the g.o.a.t of the number 9 position, Brazilian Ronaldo. (Any one who thinks Ronaldo isn't the greatest 9 of all time, leave us your answer in the comments. And we're talking out and out 9s. So no wingers, FYI Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo and Maradona are not in this category.) Ronaldo had everything as a player and I don't have enough time or space on the blog to list the attributes his man excelled in. He had everything, unfortunately he also had the injury prone attribute in his locker.
Now that we have cleared that up, I reckon I will cover 8 attributes to compare these two strikers.
First off first touch and ball control are essential for basically any position on the pitch. In this position, the first touch is important when you are in front of goal so they both obviously have a good first touch. However, I am talking about when they have have their back to goal or they are a bit outside the box and away from goal. This would be when they are in a link up play situation or about to hold the ball up to play with team mates. In these instances, when you think about it when was the last time you saw Erling Haaland be involved in a decent build up to a goal that was more than a 1-2 or a passing sequence that was more than 3 passes. For a player of his talent it highly frustrates me seeing how poor his link up and build up play is. On the other hand, the amount of times is see Chris Wood holding the ball up and keeping his opposing centre half off and away from the ball while he waits for a team mate to be in a position to pass to. And then lays off successfully to start and attack for his team, either on the counter attack or just on the end of long ball. Even if his team isn't on the counter/quick attack or played a long ball, I feel Wood's link up play either with his wingers, midfielders or the 10 is very good. Some would say "great touch for a big man." For me the Kiwi takes both attributes. 2-0.
The next attribute I would say essential for a number 9 is positioning and decision making. This could include whilst in and out of possession. At the time of writing, the New Zealander always seems to be in the right place at the right time. Obviously he is have an exceptional season for Forest, he's scoring loads of goals so yeah he's in the right place to score the goals for his team. Obviously. But I mean away from goal too. He has made some important clearances in his own box this season. Whether from a corner, deep set piece or from open play. Defensively he hasn't looked out of place. Also, along with decision making, the Kiwi drops deep to help out with build up play in the second third of the pitch. Now, I'm trying not to be too harshly critical. Remember who we are talking about. Haaland seems to drop deep and do nothing for his team. For any one who understands the game, a lot of the time when he drops deep all he seems to do is take up needed space in the middle third of the pitch. Plus, it is not just him. Because he is who he is, he will take a defender or two with him everywhere he goes. In addition, the amount of times a cross comes into the box and he's not in the area that the ball goes into. You watch it and think it's lucky City get chance after chance after chance in most games they play. At the moment both are going to the Kiwi. 4-0.
Confidence. To me confidence is the bread and butter of any striker or forward. Whether they are a number 9 or not. I feel it is swings and round abouts. They could be going through a drought, fans against them and not looking like they've ever played the game at that level before. We've all seen it. Then all of a sudden one goes in off their backside or a lucky deflected goal and everything changes. They turn into King Midas. Everything they touch turns to gold. As this is such an up and down attribute it could go either way depending on the time.
Another important attribute for a number 9 is acceleration and speed (pace). Now I did say earlier that some great past players that were incredible in the position didn't always rely on their pace. Maybe they didn't have bundles of it like some did so it is not essential yet still important. When you think of a striker using his pace down the middle you think of Erling Haaland in the Bundesliga. Scoring time after time for either RB Salzburg or Borussia Dortmund respectively. I haven't done it but maybe someone should do it but I wonder how many times the young Norwegian was in behind a team 1 on 1 with the keeper and the percentage of times it resulted in a goal. Surely it's a number quite close to 100. Before joining Manchester City, a lot of goals were scored by him either on the counter attack or from a pass played through or in behind into an acre of space for him to run onto. It was his bread and butter. It would so often finish with a dink/chip over the keeper, a powerful shot or a side footed finessed Thierry Henry type finish. I reckon if you put Chris Wood on the high street in your city and he was holding a 50 meter foot race, he might beat most people. However, in the game and at the level he plays at I would expect him to be well in the bottom half of top speed stats. Not many of his goals come from him stretching his legs and beating a defender with out and out pace. Enough said, Erling takes this one. 4-1.
One of, if not the most important attribute of a number 9 is shooting and finishing. Surely if you're playing number 9 for a team in the Premier League and international level your shooting and finishing is top notch. So even though I'm saying Haaland is better at shooting and finishing, in no way shape or form am I saying that Chris Wood is poor at these two aspects of his game. Clearly amazing. What I am saying is that how many players in the game right now would you say trumps the City man at shooting and finishing? I don't think there's much more to express in this topic. Haaland has proven with his astonishing stats that he is one of the greatest around right now at scoring goals for whatever team he is playing for. He has done it for years now and proved that he can do it in the best league in the world right now. He could smash Alan Shearer's Premier League all time top goal scorer record. I have no doubt that he could sustain scoring 25-30 goals a season, and wouldn't surprise me if he had a season where he scores a 38 goals a season averaging a goal a game for the first time ever. When you think of the calibre of strikers that have graced the Premier League, I think he has the potential to go down as the best 9 ever in the Prem. However, I can see him doing a similar thing to Harry Kane. He could get sort of close to it, and in the next 3-5 years feels the pull of one of the giants of the game e.g Real Madrid, Barcelona. 4-3.
In conclusion, you can see the numbers for yourself. Choose which numbers you want to read. Do you want to go off stats? Do you want to go off what you see, how you watch a game, the feel or analyse a game? Some people will only go off the stats and won't even entertain this idea. They might be of a certain age or generation where watching a full game and knowing the elements of a game isn't fashionable any more. Only clips of goals and events of the game are what they see on certain social media platforms. There's nothing wrong with that. But can you actual get the feel and make actual opinions on how a game is played from watching reels or videos that are only 30 seconds long or less. Even when I watch the games that I was unable to watch live on programmes like Match of the Day, I never feel like I saw how the game actually went for the full 90 minutes. When you go into detail of these two players, in my opinion, Chris Wood is one of the most suited number 9s in the Premier League for Nottingham Forest. He compliments the players around him and them to him. Maybe it is one of the reasons they have gone from a relegation battle to being in a Champions League spot in the Premier League. In comparison, when looking at Erling Haaland, not much about him as a player at this time shows me that he is a Manchester City or Pep Guardiola number 9. How often do you see him involved in any build up play? He is not exactly a tika-taka player. I can be watching a City game, at half time they come up with a stat that he has touched the ball 6 times in the whole of the first half. Yet City have scored 3 goals in the first half and Haaland has 2 of them. 2 of his 6 touches, one third of his touches were shots that resulted in goals. How many players in the world regularly have stats like that from the first half of a game. I could go on for a very long time about how I don't think City suits Haaland and Haaland doesn't suit City. Then all you have to look at is that last 5 completed seasons for the attacker. 20/21 season 27 goals in 28, 21/22 season 22 goals in 24 games, 22/23 season 36 in 35 games and 23/24 season 27 in 31 goals. In this time he moved from Dortmund to Manchester City and won the domestic treble.
After all these incredible stats, for a player who still hasn't won the Balon D'or you may be reading this thinking why am I even trying to suggest that Chris Wood is even being compared to a player like this. I have to say, if I was an owner of any football club in the world and was given the choice of signing either of these players and finances are not a problem, I wouldn't think twice and would be doing all I could to sign Erling Haaland. Even if they were the same age and at similar stages of their career. If I was creating a World XI right now or from the last 5 years, Chris Wood wouldn't be anywhere near the discussion. I hope after all this you are still not confused on what I'm trying to get at.
If you like this type of read there's more to come from Across the Touchline. The plan at the moment is to publish one topic a week. Also, once a week nearer the weekends I will try to post a Across the "digital" Touchline, which will cover everything Fantasy Premier League. Hope you enjoyed it, see you in the next one!
Thursday, 9 January 2025
Why do teams insist on playing out from the back when they are clearly not good enough to do so?
Point 1: Why most teams all over England; regardless of what league they play in; play out from the back even if they have conceded a goal because of playing that way.
Point 2: Should managers and coaches be considered lazy if they only have plan A and one way of playing. Regardless of the point in the match, the score line or even who they are playing against?
Pep Guardiola has a style of play that has revolutionised the way a lot of Europe plays football now-a-days.
Starting at Barcelona, taking certain philosophies from how Johan Cruyff set up his teams to play. Pep has taken those ways and ran with them. He then took those same philosophies to Germany, specifically Bayern Munchen. Winning trophies year after year and proving to be a serial winner, he is on his way to becoming the greatest coach of all time. Manchester United fans will argue he’s no where near. Yet if he keeps winning titles and trophies at this rate he will surpass Sir Alex Ferguson.
Now at Manchester City, Pep hasn’t slowed down winning trophies. Winning all that can be won domestically at City; including a 100-point season and a treble winning season; Guardiola has done this with a playing style that most up and down the country are trying to replicate. Whether they are challenging City for a Premier League or at the bottom of League 2, being threatened with relegation out of the Football League, teams look to his style of play for their own team.
A lot of the time, when I’m watching a game, I’ll see teams playing out from the back in tricky situations and end up losing possession so close to their own goal. This inevitably ends up with the pressing opposition winning the ball high up the pitch and having an easy opportunity on goal, if not fully capitalising and scoring.
Guess what happens next. The team plays exactly the same way. Playing out from the back as if they’ve just been zapped with one of those Men in Black memory wiping devices.
Most of the time when I see this happen it’s because the teams that do it are not good enough to do so. And I don’t mean unlucky. I mean really not good enough.
The way teams press from the front means that hardly any position has an unopposed pass. Every position has pressure on them when in possession of the ball. This is also an important trait of Pep’s philosophy. If you lose possession of the ball, can you win it back in less than 8 seconds. So like most teams in the modern game, winning the ball as high up the pitch has become the norm. Just like anything, some teams are a lot better at doing it than others.
Now if you are a team that doesn’t have the most technically gifted defenders, who aren’t the most comfortable on the ball, why would you try playing out from the back at every opportunity? I’m not saying teams who don’t have ball playing defenders should never play out from the back. Possession in nine tenths of the law yet, when you aren’t getting up the pitch playing that way and you’re just attracting more pressure on yourself as a team, surely it’s time to change things up.
On the flip side, I’m not saying those teams without ball playing defenders should start playing like Tony Pulis’ Stoke in 2011. Hitting the channel, long balls, getting the ball into the box at the earliest chance. The times when conceding a corner was the preferred choice over conceding a throw-in deep in your own half. Rory Delap’s long throw caused havoc and produced the saying, “yeah but could he do it on a Tuesday night at Stoke.” From these classic days to today’s game it is chalk and cheese. Almost unrecognisable and has moved more into more of a tactical chess game than a game of taking a chance and percentage balls.
The difference in how the game is played today brings me to my second point. Should managers and coaches be considered lazy for only having one style of play. You'll see so many teams conceding goals either trying to play out from the back or concede in a similar fashion multiple times, sometimes including in the same game.
I could go back decades to make this point. However, my first example of this is Marcelo Bielsa at Leeds United. SeƱor Bielsa is hailed a God throughout the West Yorkshire city after the mighty whites were promoted under his leadership after 16 years of being out of the Premier League. However, if it wasn’t for the promotion at only the second time of asking under his reign, he would have been marked a mad man at the club. People need to remember that he inherited a team that finished 14th/15th in the Championship the year before, and made only slight changed to the squad. Maybe 2 out, 3-4 in that changed the starting line up of the team. The team went from a midtable, bang average Championship team, to a top half of the table Premier League team in two and a half seasons. It was by a method of his way or the high way. A small squad size, double training sessions, short recovery times and a defensive style that saw centre backs being pulled out of positions left, right and centre. Under his fantastic leadership, his defence was making mistakes that are taught at U10 ages. Initially, his one way style brought the best football to Elland Road since David O’Leary was in charge almost 20 years prior. However, essentially lost him his job once technically better teams had worked out his tactics. If he had a plan B, C and D, would his sacking have been postponed? That Leeds side had one way of playing. 100 miles per hour football. Man to man marking system all over the pitch. Shape and formations down to a tee in every situation of the game, no matter what the situation of the game was or who they were up against.
My second examples are Vincent Kompany at Burnley and Russell Martin at Southampton. Both did brilliant jobs getting their teams promoted. Both had a style of play getting promoted and were successful. However, this also could have been because they had the top squads technically in the Championship respectfully. Similarly, once promoted into the Premier League they were no longer among the best squads in the league. Playing the same style of play no longer brought them success. Burnley were expectedly relegated and if Southampton this season beat relegation it will be one of the greatest escapes in the Premier League era. The differences for their exit of their respective clubs is Kompany got the head coach role at Bayern Munich and Russell Martin was sacked midway through the season.
Lastly, Ange Postecoglu at Tottenham Hotspurs. Personally I don’t have a bad word to say about Ange. I don’t know what it is about Australians in sport, but when you hear them speak in their interviews it is so refreshing. Their honesty, the Aussie grit and mostly their ethics in life crossing over into their sport. You can say the same things about Daniel Ricciado, Leighton Hewitt and Ricky Ponting. The integrity cannot be questioned, and if you try to they’ll let you know about it.
I digressed.
Ange Postecoglu is also a manager who has his way of playing. His teams show how he thinks the game should be played and it produced the most entertaining games in the league. Ultimately, with Spurs’ squad quality, are they under achieving and more to the point, are they under achieving because Ange only plays one way? I feel that the man from the land down under will be fully judged at the end of this season. I’m just not sure what will constitute in being judged a success at the end of this season. Winning a trophy? Top 4? Top 6 and European football next season?
All in all, I think there is a reoccuring theme for managers and coaches that only have one way of playing. Mostly sacked for looking like they’re going to be relegated.
This equates to how a lot of teams are trying to play the way that Guardiola has brought football to the Premier League. They end up with only one way of playing. They have their principles and philosophies and stick to them strictly.
In my opinion, the way managers kept the jobs longer 20-30 years ago is they tinkered a lot more with their teams. Not only the starting line up, but the tactics depending on who they were playing that week and the in game tactics depending on how the game was going. I’m not saying they changed everything for every game. They had their ways of doing things and would have concentrated on their oppositions way of doing things too.
Previously on Across the Touchline...
Why are Teams That Get Promoted Immediately Relegated?
The Idea. So for a few seasons now, the teams that have been promoted from the Championship into the Premier League have been unable to avoi...
-
At the end of the 2024 European Championship Gareth Southgate stepped down as the men's England manager. The big question that football ...
-
Point 1 : Why most teams all over England; regardless of what league they play in; play out from the back even if they have conceded a goal ...
-
To keep up to date with all things Across the Touchline, follow the blog on either: Instagram @across_the_touchline or X (Twitter) @ATTouchl...