Across The Touchline
A blog all about football And Long Live Billy Connolly!
Friday, 4 April 2025
Across the "Digital" Touchline: Fantasy Football *Week 30*
Monday, 31 March 2025
Attributes Needed to Make It to The Very Top of Football
What is needed to become a pro?
In some sense this is a very basic question. On the other hand this can go as deep as it possibly can. Of course you need to be good at football. Duuh! You need to be athletic in every sense of the word. Compared to maybe 30 years ago, today's football players are prime athletes, and if they are not they will be found out. The body fat percentages and all the fitness tests you can do in the world are all off the scale when it comes to professional footballers. I'm talking: stamina, speed, agility, flexibility, strength, power, balance, co-ordination, how many more do you want? These are just physical. Then you have tactically, socially, psychologically and mentally. The list of attributes goes on and on. In this piece I am going to talk about my opinion of not just what makes a professional footballer, but what separates the good from the great from the crème de la crème of professional footballers.
First the good. A lot of people, boy and girls, men and women love football in England. The percentage of people who start off playing football at amateur level hoping to one day make it is quite high. The percentage of people who actually make it is less than 0.003%. The success story numbers are incredibly low. I'm not talking the amount of people who make it and go on to play at the top of the game, representing their country, winning the Premier League and playing in Europe. I'm talking even being paid to play football somewhere around the League Two level. Then the great, from there if you do actually kick on and go on to playing in the Premier League, those percentages are even lower. The crème de la crème players that go on to become world class and have that consistency for most of their career, mainly have another 5-10% plus mentality.
The different attributes for different positions.
Physical attributes needed by players can sometimes change depending on what position they play. The physique or even body type of a player can be different for the position they play too. Obviously most goalkeepers are strong and usually well over 6 feet tall. They are agile and have great agility. Even if some goal keepers claim they are not as agile and show as good agility as other top goal keepers, compared to a "mere mortal" average human, they are still at the very top of the scale. Like I said before it is just an extra few percentages that separate the good, great and world class. This may be a recurring sentence I use during this blog. A lot of wingers have a totally different physique to most centre backs. Wingers are usually electrically fast and the type of humans that look like they could catch pigeons. Centre backs are usually 6 feet tall and over, show good strength and power. These are very basic examples.
Never miss a blog and follow on X
Over the last 20 years the game has changed a bit in English football. Some of that has to do with the type of coaches that have come to coach in the Premier League. I think one of the very first to make a drastic change in the Premier League era of English football was Arsene Wenger. He changed attitudes in terms of the diet, health, fitness and life style of professional footballers at the top. Changing how players see food and drink to make their body a temple changed Arsenal football club and without him probably wouldn't have gotten the better of Manchester United from the late 90's to mid 2000's. They went back and fourth with the Red Devils winning a few trophies; including the Premier League title, the FA Cup and going deep into the Champions League. Not only did they win the Premier League a couple of times, they are the only, and still the only team to win the Premier League without losing a game in the league all season. Yeah they had great players all over the pitch, great coaching staff with the state of the arts facilities, yet I think the few percentages that the team needed to get themselves over the line to winning silver ware was the methods of Arsene Wenger.
Why attributes have changed.
Another coach that has arrived on our shores and shaken up the philosophy of the beautiful game and how it is played is Pep Guardiola. Sometimes I think it is unoriginal and lazy that other coaches replicate the Spaniard's style of play for their own teams but if you can't beat them join them. The style of play that is now played in this country has slightly changed the key attributes for certain positions. Like I said earlier, goalkeepers and defenders are usually tall, strong and have power. Now-a-days they need that and also great footballing skills. To go with the philosophy of playing out from the back, a centre back and full back now needs to be almost as good at passing and receiving as a creative centre mid. You need to be a Tony Adams mixed with Paul Scholes all in one. The same with goalkeepers. Not only have you got to be able to; keep the ball out of the net, strong in a one v one situation, take control of your penalty area by catching and punching to be an ariel presence; but you also have to be good with your feet. We have seen perfectly good goalkeepers be ousted by the top teams. Joe Hart and Aaron Ramsdale to name a couple. Just because even though as a goalkeeper they do a job for the team by keeping clean sheets and being a great shot stopper, they're simply not good enough with their feet. This goes against the coaches new philosophy and methods of how he or she wants their team to play out from the back and build up play. So they're out.
I have an opinion on full backs that I don't think is shared by many. It is not very nice; I'll admit; yet I think it is true. I believe that right back or left back is not a specialists position. I don't think players grow up wanting to be right back or left back. Simply, I think players who play in these positions are either failed centre backs or failed wingers. They're still good enough to be in the squad or the team, just not good enough to play centre back or winger as first or even second choice. How many times do you see a centre back or a centre mid filling in at full back. Teams won't have too many back up full backs in their squad. They're not going to waste transfer and wage budget money bringing in a third choice left back. If there are injuries and/or suspensions in the team and they are going into a game with no recognised left back, the manager is happy enough to either put a centre mid or a centre back in that position. Unless your team is hampered by many, many injuries at a stage of the season, what other positions do you see this happen in? You don't see a 'target man type 9' filling in for a winger, or a 6 playing up top because of injuries. If you look at the physique and top attributes of right and left backs, you will notice which they were meant to be; a centre back or winger. In today's game Kyle Walker, Trent Alexander-Arnold, Kieran Trippier, Aaron Wan-Bissaka and Milos Kerkez. Fast, Speedy, good acceleration, good with the ball at their feet and crossing the ball. Failed wingers. Ben White, Dan Burn, Josko Gvardiol plus Jamie Carragher and Gary Neville. Big, tall strong, powerful, not at good on the ball but great at reading the game and breaking up play. Failed centre backs.
Across the Touchline on Instagram
Follow on Instagram and never miss a blog update
As the game changes, so do the philosophies then so do the attributes needed in each position. One thing that stays the same for me, and is the same in all sport is mentality. The most important thing you need to make it as a professional athlete is mentality. Really it is also true outside of sport and in life but let me stick to what I know. I am not going to start talking about being a great salesman or lawyer or stock market broker because to be honest I know next to nothing about those industries and I'm here to talk about football and occasionally other sports. Look at other sports too and the athletes that are considered the best to ever play their respective sport. Roger Federer, Tiger Woods, Floyd Mayweather, Sachin Tendulkar or Shane Warne. You could never question their mentality, whether it was the first game of a tournament or a final, their mentality to win never wavered. Michael Jordan is up there for being one of the best athletes ever. There's stories of MJ not making his high school team and by the time he's leaving high school he's one of the best players in the NBA. This is clearly because he has massively improved his basketball skills yet to do that he had to change him mentality. Did he become the best athlete of all time? I'm not sure how you would measure who is actually number one... I guess it comes down to opinion on this one at the end of the day, plus maybe some biases on what sport you prefer or how much of that sport you have seen. Ronnie O'Sullivan is considered the best snooker player of all time due to his talent. I think even less would argue he is the most talented snooker player of all time. In his recent documentary he openly admits that when he isn't there mentally, he is so far off his game he doesn't deserve to win a game, never mind a tournament. A very good example of you can be the most talented at what you do but if your head isn't in the game you'll be well off it.
The most important attribute.
A players mentality can decide how far they go in the game. We see almost every year, a young, talented, hot prospect make his/her way onto the scene out of nowhere and become a wonderkid. It happens a lot and fans end up judging them on what they have done in their first 10 games of their career. We see it all the time, a player is dynamite at the age of 16-18 years old and by the time they are 25 they are playing in the Championship, League One or even out of the game. There is nothing wrong with playing in the Championship or League One. Like I said earlier, only 0.003% of people who start playing football in England make it to that level so it is clearly some achievement. However, my point is that wonderkids come onto the scene and look like they are going to take the league by the scruff of the neck. They show talent and skill of the greatest to play the game, then by the time they are 24 or 25 they hype has died down because then never reached the height of potential that fans first thought of.
Players like Ethan Nwaneri, Miles Lewis-Skelly, Archie Gray, Lamine Yamal and a few others in the last 2-3 years. Lamine Yamal is slightly further down the line of establishing himself as a wonderkid, who is proving that he may become a top player. However, lets look a Ethan Nwaneri. I have no connection to Arsenal Football Club. I don't support then nor do I support one of their main rivals. I am quite impartial to any debated surrounding them. The first time I had notice Nwaneri was when Bukayo Saka had got injured and he would make appearances for Arsenal off the bench. He has scored a couple of goals and had some very promising games for the Gunners. Where I have a slight problem is that the lad has played 19 games in total for Arsenal. That's 19 games in his professional senior career and you hear fans and pundits saying this player can go right to the very top. Have a day off will you Rodney.
We could say it about 10 players a season that they could go to the very top and we say that because of the talent that we see. The thing that will take them to the very top of the game is an attribute that no coach and no therapist can measure or predict and that's mentality. There are so many players that have played in the Premier League in the last 20-30 years that were great but still didn't reach the top is huge. To measure this I would use Manchester United. Whether you like them or not, as a team they have the best record in the Premier League. Since it's launch in the 1992/93 season, Manchester United have won 13 Premier League titles out of 32 completed seasons. That's 40% of the time they have won the league, and they haven't won it in over 10 years. So at one point they had won 13 in 20 years, that's 65%. Let's use this as a measuring stick of the best of the best in the Premier League era. In the other years from 1992 to now, next on the list is Manchester City with 8, then Chelsea with 5, Arsenal have a few titles and Liverpool, Leicester City and Blackburn Rovers all have one each.
The crème de la crème.
Think of the great players to play in the Premier League but wouldn't get anywhere near playing in that Manchester United team. The great players like Paolo Di Canio, Niko Kranjcar, Mousa Dembele, Jay Jay Okocha; the list goes on and on. They had all the talent in the world and did things on a football pitch that mesmerised fans and pundits yet were never on Manchester United's radar. Maybe they needed to be the star player in the team. When scouts go to assess a player to bring into their club, these are also the sort of things they will look into. Not only what they do on the pitch but what are they like as a person and how's their temperament. These type of players needed to be in the starting line up every week and play every minute. There's nothing wrong with this in my opinion, yet players that do this maybe sometimes stunt themselves of ever getting to the very top in football. At the end of the day their mentality let them down. Actually, this is nothing to be ashamed of as I think this happens to 99% of the 0.003% that make it. Only a handful of people on this planet have this type of mentality to make it to the very top of their profession. It isn't something that you can turn on and off. You could put them into a small meaningless game of tiddlywinks and they still have the desire and passion to win.
Maybe these players weren't that focused on winning every single year, week after week, day to day. They might have seen a football career as something to enjoy. They may have been world class for a season or two and then dropped back off with their team. A bit more than just being in form but less than creating a legacy or being a great. To me "world class" can sometimes be thrown around too much about too many players. I think world class is if we were to make a game with two teams playing against each other, would the player be on either team or in the either squad. So basically there are 2-3 players in each position that are world class. Sometimes there are a couple more or a couple less. At the moment, it is becoming apparent that there are less world class number 9's in the game. In the 90's to 2000's there were maybe 7-8 number 9's to choose from just for the England squad. Very good strikers would miss out on ever playing for England in a major tournament. That's only England I'm talking about, there would be so many around European teams and the world that were icon and top top strikers if not world class. It has slightly changed now to being a lot of top top wingers.
The difference isn't always what players do on the pitch. It isn't always about stats, numbers and percentages. A big reason of why and how players get to the levels that they do is what they do off the pitch. Not only in training and how they train but their lifestyle and how they recover between games. To be the absolute best you need to eat, drink, sleep and breath the game. Players now will have everything in place to make sure that their body is performing at 100% throughout the season. I agree, there won't be many times in the season when players are fully 100%, yet they will do things in their own time to try and get as close as possible to being fully, fully fit. Things like hiring their own chef at home that can accommodate their strict diet regime. Having their own ice baths and saunas fitted into their homes to aid with recovery. Maybe certain mattresses or home comforts will be added into their home. The players who are at the very top are doing things 24/7 365 days of the year to get themselves their and to keep themselves there.
Remember, a lot of players will make it to the top, yet staying there for the vast time in your career is another story. Some players have unbelievable seasons and then drop off again and some players will make it to the stop and stay there for 10 years plus. In today's game I'm talking about the likes of Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo. Players in the conversation of greatest of all time; even though people have tried to knock them off their pedestal at the top of football for years; never get deterred and find ways to adapt and overcome adversities in any shape or form. It can be hard to get to the top of the mountain, but staying there for a long time even harder. There's less oxygen, the weather can change on the spin of a coin and there's not much space for a lot of people.
In Conclusion.
What it all comes down to is the overall attributes: physical, tactical, technical, mental and psychological. Depending on how many of these overall attributes you have will probably depend on how far up the list of great players you are. I think if you make it into the game at professional level you are probably exceeding in 2 of these overall attributes. Physically and technically. How many times did we use to hear, "he's good, but just not big enough." I'm sure Messi would have got that when he was about 10 years old. If Messi was coming into football in the 90's he probably wouldn't have been given the chance back then. As the game has changed into a much more technical game with the ball more on the floor, I think we will see this less and less. Players being rejected because of their physical size is probably a thing of the past.
As you go up the pyramid of the football league you will see an increase in the overall attributes that players have. As you get to the top of League Two, into League One and flirting with the Championship, players will definitely have needed to add a third overall attribute. They will have needed to show their understanding of the game tactically along with being physically astute to play the game and obviously be technically good enough to play at this level. I would also add that at times the players at this level will show how strong they are psychologically. They will have hit bumps in the road, they will have knock backs and also played in huge pressure situations. Whether it be a huge game or situations in games where they either need to deliver or they have their backs against the wall. Coming through these moments can define a players career and show how they grow as a player in their development.
At the top; and I'm talking the top of the Championship into the Premier League; I think the biggest difference is mentality. The player's mentality to improve and keep improving their physicality, technical ability and tactical understanding of what they are being asked to do in the system of their team. As a player keeps going up and up and up, from a top Championship player to an established Premier league player, to playing for a top top team in Europe, it is all about mentality to keep going and not being satisfied with where they currently are, wanting to break records. It seems like these type of players just don't have a ceiling and can achieve more or less anything they put their minds to. To be honest, I don't think these players give themselves time to enjoy their career. Even if they've won a trophy, league or something like a treble, their next thought is always: what's next? what can I win next? what is the next record I can break? It is never enough.
The difference is the mentality.
And Long Live Sir Billy Connolly!
Monday, 24 March 2025
Liverpool's Big 3 Out-of-Contract Players
Who has the power?
When we look at Liverpool coming towards the end of this season, they have 3 huge players coming to the end of their contracts. As they are in great position to win the Premier League this season, you would think that if they were to lose all 3 players, they have no chance of being in the same position next season. Defenders Virgil Van Dijk and Trent Alexander-Arnold plus star man Mohamed Salah are all out of contract at the end of the 2024/25 season. My first thought is, there’s no way Liverpool can afford to lose all 3 players if they want to keep up with the competition at the top in England and in European competitions.
In all honesty, I think all 3 players are waiting to see what the others are going to be offered, so it may help them in negotiating more on their own deal. For example, if Trent or Van Dijk get offered £400,000 per week, then Mo Salah comes to the club saying he should be paid more and he wants to be the highest earner at the club. As a result, I think it's possible 2 out of 3 may leave Liverpool in the summer. I hope this doesn’t happen. I have no connection with Liverpool football club, yet I feel it will weaken the Premier League and I want as many world class players playing in the league as possible.
All 3 players are treated differently by the fans. Of course, if you are a Liverpool fan you want all 3 to renew their contracts. Why wouldn’t you? I think it gets tricky and splits opinion, if you asked Liverpool fans to choose only 1 or 2 out of 3 to resign.
Across the Touchline on Instagram
Follow the Blog on Instagram
Are Liverpool Going to Lose All 3?
I think Van Dijk has been treated very well by the Liverpool fans and will be in the time during the negotiation stages of the new contract extension. The Dutchman will be seen as a vital part of why Liverpool were able to win the Premier League and the Champions League, along with the signing of goal keeper Alisson Becker. The signing of both players was immediately evident in the team’s performances and what the team won since their arrivals. Also with VVD’s leadership on and off the pitch, I think he is irreplaceable and arguably the best centre back in the world right now. If not the best, definitely top 3. His current salary is £220,000 per week. The second highest at the club after Mohamed Salah.
Trent Alexander Arnold is a different kettle of fish compared to the other two mentioned, as he is a home grown talent and came through the academy system. He joined the club at just 6 years old and has represented the club at U16, U18 and is now vice-captain of the first team. The scouser in the team. The fans will expect him to respect the club being a fellow scouser. They will see it as the club comes first and you as a player should feel the ultimate privilege to play for this club as you are from this city. If Trent is offered a contract he should sign it and be happy he has been offered an extension to play for his club. These feelings go deep into the city of Liverpool and are not only the thoughts of people from Liverpool but every city in the UK.
Home grown talent are given a slightly different ride than players who are brought in. Don’t even think of joining a rival club. Even if it’s not a rival club but a club that plays in the same league, the player can be given a hostile reception when returning to their club. You don’t see it too much any more but there use to be quite a few one club players. Players like Steven Gerrard, Gary Kelly or Tony Adams. Even out of the UK you had players like Paolo Maldini, Francesco Totti or Carlos Puyol and many more. Players who only played for one club or played the vast majority of their playing career at one club.
Even though Trent Alexander-Arnold is Liverpool's third highest earner; with a salary of £180,000 per week; I don’t think Liverpool fans will have as much patience with the scouser as the other two players.
Keep updated on the next blog post on X
Mo Salah, Running Down the Wing.
Mohamed Salah is having the season of all seasons. I'm writing this after Liverpool have played 29 games in the Premier League. Top of the league; after beating Southampton 3-1 at home; by 15 points and an inferior goal difference. The closest teams Arsenal and Nottingham Forest do have a game in hand yet that still effectively puts them 13 points behind if they win their game in hand. Effectively because of Liverpool’s inferior goal difference.
Earlier in the season, Salah did come out and do a few public interviews. It was spoken quite a bit by pundits on Sky Sports Football. He was obviously trying to force the hand of the Liverpool board. As he is lauded by the Liverpool fans for the performances and the stats he has produced over the last 7 or 8 seasons. After signing for Liverpool from Fiorentina in 2017 he has always seemed to produce great numbers and always been in and around the golden boot for the Premier League. He could have done the public interviews to get more fans on his side. I don't think he's threatening, yet a big part of me thought he was putting it out there that if he's not given a deal that he likes, he will move on. Maybe he was also putting himself in the "shop window" and trying to get the attention of other clubs, that he might be available at the end of the season on a Bosman.
I think a great way for this to all defuse would be to make the negotiations public. Why wouldn't they? A lot of fans will literally think, "Pay him what he wants. He's one of the best in his position in the world. His stats this season show that, and how much would it cost to get a player like him to replace him?" If the negotiations were out there for the public to see, the fans would see who was in the wrong and who to support. For example, if the club are seen to be not giving the Egyptian a good enough deal in the current climate of salaries, the fans will see that and back their player. However, lets say Liverpool have offered Salah stupid money and are willing to make him the top earner in the league, and he's still not signing, I think the fans would realise it is not the clubs fault.
The way it looks like the club is run in terms of money spent on player fees and salaries doesn't look too shabby. I don't see Liverpool as a club that throw a load of money at the wall and see how much will stick. They never seem to be scrambling in transfer windows and it seems like recently there's not many players that are bought for astronomical prices that don't work out. Players like Andrew Robertson, Wataru Endo and Sadio Mane were all brought in for quite small fees and had great years at the club. Also, the academy seems to bring through good prospects every now and again. Players like full back Conor Bradley and midfielders Harvey Elliot and Curtis Jones it can save the club millions.
From afar it seems like the club has structure and a plan on how they are going to do things. It seems that they have guidelines and as if they have caps on how much they are willing to spend and make sure it makes sense. A year or two ago when Jude Bellingham was leaving Borussia Dortmund, Liverpool could have easily slapped down an offer of well over £100 million. Whether it would have been accepted and whether Jude would have wanted to sign for Liverpool is a different story. Obviously they weren't willing to spend that amount of money on one player when they were losing central midfielders Fabinho, James Milner and Jordan Henderson at a very similar time. They needed to fill the whole in the middle of the pitch and instead of panicking and making a rash decision to buy they waited for the right player(s) at the right price for them.
It looks like the club has a structure, a way of spending money and a financial plan that they don't break. In my opinion this is one of the very rare moments that you could break what you plan. Replacing Mo Salah and to replicate what the team are doing this season, next season is highly highly unlikely. Now we have seen a few clubs recently sell their star man that scores all the goals; Harry Kane, Ivan Toney, Dominic Solanke; and the teams have kicked on and done well. Even outside of the Premier League. For example, PSG look a much better team now they don't have a Kylian Mbappe, Lionel Messi or Neymar type star figure. It's as if other players have now been able to step up now they are no longer in the shadows of a poster boy. These teams have sort of shown that losing your star player isn't always the worst thing that could happen. However, these teams aren't competing for the Premier League, Champions League and basically every tournament available in domestic football.
The more I think about it, my opinion on the situation swings. On one hand if Salah puts pen to paper, Liverpool are more than likely breaking their financial structure but if you're going to do that, you're going to do it for a player like Salah. The winger is obviously going to be near impossible to replace. This season he has scored 27 goals and got 17 assists after 29 games. He is having a season where he's breaking a lot of personal, club and Premier League records, yet he may be thinking, "Leave while I'm on top." A lot of players can continue for a year or two too long and ruin how they are remembered. This happens not just in football but all sport. There's some chance that the Egyptian breaks all records this season, signs a new contract and then next season has quite a dip and doesn't perform any where near what he has done this season. I don't expect him to repeat the numbers of this season anyway but it could be that he drops off a long way. I don't think it will happen but I've seen it before where players have a flyer on their contract renewal season and then drop off once they've sign their new lucrative deal.
Honestly, deep down, I think the deal is done. Romeo done. I think it has been agreed, signed and this is all a publicity stunt. In todays world there's so much emphasis on clicks and views and doing things just to create and generate more attention. At the start of the season; or even as far back as last season; people would be realising this is the last season of Mo Salah's contract. The talks around pundits, media and fans would have started and this season it has amplified; maybe because of the numbers he's producing. I think it has turned into a soap drama and it has brought in even more attention. It will build and build, until all that has to be done is the release of the information that "Mohamed Salah has signed a new 2 year deal with Liverpool club." Blah Blah Blah. When it is eventually released, and the news drops that this seasons top goal scorer has signed, it will explode all over the internet and create quite a revenue in clicks and views. The tactic is a good one. Maybe not great for the blood pressure of most Liverpool fans but great for the publicity of the player and the club. And remember, all publicity is good publicity.
Just my honest opinion on the whole subject. Like I said, I have no connection to Liverpool Football Club nor am I a fan of one of their major rivals. I neither like them or dislike them, I think this makes me pretty neutral in the subject and for me when it comes to it football is the winner.
And Long Live Sir Billy Connolly!
Friday, 21 March 2025
Across the "Digital" Touchline: Fantasy Football *Week 29*
Guess who's back, back again.
Monday, 17 March 2025
Why British Players Don't Play Abroad
You don't see many average English players going to play abroad. It's as if it is the "crème de la crème" of the British talent that gets noticed across the boarders and the rest don't exist. It seems like the views haven't changed since back in the 80's too. In 1986, Gary Lineker joined Barcelona on a 3 year deal until 1989. He is one of England's all time top goal scorers and maybe in a list of top 10 England players ever. Winning Golden Boots and goal scoring records, Lineker shone for Tottenham Hotspurs and Everton in England's First Division. At the same time, Mark Hughes also played for Barcelona. He was slightly less fortunate and not played as much as Lineker and moved out on loan to Bayern Munich for a season. There use to be a rule that you were only allowed 3 foreign players in your team at a time. The Premier League use to have a similar rule about non-European players too. This has since changed and now you can have as many as you like from where ever.
Never Miss a Thing by Following the Blog on Instagram
Towards the end of his career, Lineker joined Japanese side Nagoya Grampus. In today's game this could be likened to players joining the MLS, The Chinese Super League or The Saudi Pro League. Going for a bit of extra retirement cash or to grow the game in that part of the world. I agree these days you don't really grow the game with the odd player joining a team in a country that doesn't have massive exposure to the top players in the world. Even though Lineker would have got a much better deal from the Japanese side than any team in Europe for his last two years in the game, I do believe he went there to try and grow the game in Japan. It could have been like what China were trying to do around 2015-2020 and it just never took off.
The MLS may have done this in America and was almost started by David Beckham. Building a platform to promote the game and make it what it is today with other super stars joining more recently. Without Beckham going there 20 years ago, I don't think you would see players like Zlatan Ibrahimovic going to The States to play, or even more recently Lionel Messi joining Inter Miami. It's all publicity stunts and the athletes get a nice pay out. That's the positive side of it.
Maybe it is for another blog to get into the ins and outs of players and countries developing the infrastructure of the game in smaller footballing nations around the world. I've digressed. Back to it.
A few players did this in the 80's and earlier but not many. It always seemed to be the best British players such as; Laurie Cunningham, David Platt, Peter Beardsley, Graeme Souness and Chris Waddle. All internationals for their country and playing at the top teams in English League Football. Glenn Hoddle was another. He joined AS Monaco in 1987 until 1991 after playing at Spurs for 12 years. He made almost 400 appearances for the North London club, was recognised as one of the best English players of his generation and then moved abroad. It is only the top players that get recognised? It's not all the best players that go, but seems to be the players that go are one of the best at the time.
Things have never really changed. Entering the 90's and the age of the Premier League, still not many British players go to play abroad.
The Modern Era
David Beckham
The Apprenticeships
Do Managers Perform Any Better Abroad?
Gary Neville's Valencia experience isn't a good place to start so I'm not even going to talk about it.
Managers More Recently
In Conclusion
Monday, 10 March 2025
Rivalries in Football
Records Don't Mean Anything in a Derby Game
When I think of rivalries in football, I think of fans and players who hate each other. It's a must win game to gain bragging rights against the other team, at least until the next time you play them. Specifically, when I think of British rivalries in football I think: Celtic - Rangers, Man United - Liverpool, Man United - Arsenal, Man United - Leeds or Newcastle United - Sunderland. Yeah, lots of teams hate Man United.
What really makes a rivalry or a derby?
The first reason I think is location. Maybe it could be the same city or county in the UK. If this is the case there are so many rivalries in British football. There are lots of multiple football team cities in the UK. Some are geographically closer than others. London has quite a few teams in the English Football League. I think as there are so many teams in one city, its slightly weakens some London derby games. I said some....
Follow the blog on X
West Ham United - Millwall.
London Derbies
Multi-team Cities
Across the Boarder - Inter-City Rivals
Player Rivalries
The Old Firm
Monday, 3 March 2025
Getting Referees in From Other Leagues Around the World
Lets Start by Clearing Some Stuff Up
People who come away from any football game blaming the referees are idiots. At any level, whether it is a grass roots game, Premier League or a World Cup Final. Your team lost the game. The officials could have made a mistake yet your team probably didn't take their chances or were weak defensively. There's more chance your team's players were making mistakes and you need a scapegoat. "Target the refs, its the easiest way out." To be honest, if you're going to a grass roots game and complaining about the ref, go home and take a look in the mirror. Maybe give your head a shake. You are the problem. The refs at those games are most likely volunteering, giving up their weekends, officiating for free to work their way up the ladder or possibly just to be involved in a sport that they love.
This is not a post about bashing the officials that we have in English football. This is to talk and discuss about the problems that we have in the game right now and what could be done to improve it. Suggestions coming out saying the officials should be doing interviews after the game aren't a good idea for me. The only time you're going to want to hear from a ref is when they've done something wrong or made a bad decision. If the officials were hardly involved in the game, went unnoticed and the game ran smoothly, do you still want to hear from the ref?
Follow on Twitter to keep up with the next published blogs!
I'm Sick of Talking About it, But Here We Go...
"You go on about VAR this, VAR that, help the officials out. Clearly they need help. We play in the Premier League, the best league in the world, the most watched league in the world. So give them all the help they need cos they've clearly cost us two points today. It's a joke!"
Charlie Austin, 10 November 2018.
For me, most of the time, the biggest problem isn't the officials on the pitch. There's 4 of them. They're human and they're going to make mistakes. That's part of the game. Whenever you watch a game now that's not a Premier League game; in the Championship for example; there's no VAR. Actually, it's quite refreshing and to be honest; 99% of the time; I'm not complaining about the officials at the end of the game. Sometimes there are howlers of decisions. Every now and again there's a close offside missed or a hand ball missed but when you go back to it and watch it again you can show sympathy and see why a certain decision has been missed or why a decision has been given that way. Sometimes in a game there's a foul, hand ball or offside in the build up to a goal and you don't even notice it, until you see the replay in super slow-mo.
I find games without VAR more refreshing to watch. If you have VAR in a game, how can you still be getting so many decisions wrong. Maybe the decisions aren't wrong by the letter of the law and I think that is the biggest annoyance in the game these days. The way these laws and rules are written are bollocks. Utter bollocks. There's either too much interpretation and opinion or not enough. The game is all about opinions and debate. It could have gone this way, or that way. However, my problem is when you see a decision and 99 people out of 100; because there's always a village idiot; can clearly see the referee has got it wrong. My problem isn't that the ref or lino has got it horribly wrong, it's that a person sat at a TV screen, who has the ability to re-watch and re-watch, from practically any angle they want and still not see the mistake.
VAR was brought in to correct the howler and the misidentification. Like that one for Arsenal in 2014 against Chelsea, where Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain denied a goal using his hand and Kieran Gibbs was shown a red card. It was clear misidentification, even with 'Ox' explaining to the official it was him. Howlers of decisions pop up all over the place. These things happen. There's only 4 officials at the game and they only have 2 eyes each. Things can be missed and things can be seen wrongly. It happens. Yet the way VAR has been used recently is not for the reason and ways we were told they would be. A big problem for lots of people is the time it take to get to the decision; whether they agree with the decision made or not; and the actual wording of the rules and laws now.
Why are the rules and laws written in such a way. This for me is why there is so much confusion and inconsistency around the game now. Also, the reason why there are so many strange red cards and disallowed goals. It is taking the game away from the fans. When a decision has been passed over to VAR, there have been instances where it has taken over 3 or 4 minutes. What are the fans doing in this time? There's not real explanation to fans in the stadium and they're the ones who pay their hard earned money to buy the tickets. These days ticket prices are astronomical and the fans are sitting there looking at a screen saying, "possible handball" or "possible offside." How is that fair?
They have to make edits to the game, from how it is today and make is more spectator friendly. One easy way of doing this is letting the fans watch replays on the big screen. Let them see what you would be able to see if you was at home or down the pub watching on TV. Or a big one for me; and I've been saying it for years; mic the refs up and let the stadium hear them. This way it can be explained in a tenth of the time and everyone knowns what's going on. I'm not saying do what happened in the Women's Euros, where the whole game stops just so we can listen. Mic the official up, so we can hear them the whole game. Let us listen to the conversations throughout the game and we, as fans, can see the process into the making of the decision.
Another positive of this will be the respect for referees. Do this and watch how much the players swear and mistreat the referees. There's so much cancel culture in society now. Rightly or wrongly, that's for another debate. What I'm saying is, players now-a-days are making themselves into a brand and want to be role models in society more than ever. Do you think it makes them look good if they're heard swearing and insulting referees every week.
Maybe certain changes could be trialled in lower leagues. Could teams being given a number of 'challenges' per game be the way to go? Or would this bring in more tactics to either waste time or kill the momentum of a trailing team towards the end of a game? A team is 1-0 up with 5 minutes to go and under the cosh, all of a sudden they challenge a decision and the game is stopped for a minute or three. Pressure over and a breather. To me this also sounds very American Football. Our game doesn't have the natural breaks in game play like NFL, tennis or rugby. Therefore, I don't see a practical way of bringing in challenges.
Realistically, I would bring in a 30 second rule. The Video Assistant Referee has 30 seconds to look at a scenario to decide to overturn a decision. Any longer than 30 seconds and it's deemed not a howler, as a result, it is not a howler. Carry on. Even if the VAR are not overturning a decision and have made spotted something on on field officials haven't, they are still only allowed to look at a clip for 30 seconds max. And none of this super slow-mo crap. The scenario must be played in full speed for the decision to be made this speed must be taken into strong consideration. I agree slow it down to see; for example; if the ball hits the arm or shoulder, or if it has taken a deflection, and even if the arm is in a natural position, yet even when you're talking about it there is so much interpretation to what is or isn't.
Across the Touchline Instagram
Follow on Instagram so you don't miss the next one!
Big Ref, Little Ref.
I would like to think that these officials in our game in England don't have a corrupt bone in their body. I would also like to think they are very professional and when it comes to officiating certain games with certain teams they are not swayed. I believe the current crop of officials in the Premier League are as professional as ever. Yet I can't help think that there is a hierarchy within the official's team.
They have a mix of experience and newer referees. Some have a vast amount of Premier League games officiated in and go off to be chosen for European competition or even World Stage competition. If one of these experienced referees gets a decision wrong, how likely are one of the newer, lower down the pecking order, referees going to correct them. I sometimes see it and think, "If he overturns his decision, when they get back to Stockley Park on Monday, he's going to be given the "hair drier treatment, and he knows it."
I bet some of these refs have bigger egos than some of the players and don't like being shown up. Then I bet if they are, the one who corrected them and showed them up are punished by not officiating in the Premier League the next weekend. This almost creates a pact. A bit like the magicians circle. Referees Only Club.
Even on the highlight shows and Sky Sports Soccer Saturday, they'll have an experienced ex-referee talking us through that side of the game. It's usually someone like Dermott Gallagher or Mike Dean. Fantastic referees back in the day. They both officiated some huge games in English football and probably around the world. How many mistakes do you reckon they made across their careers? Tonnes. Fucking tonnes, and they are still up their with the best the Premier League has produced and seen.
Now. How many times on these shows do they see a decision that everyone else is saying is wrong; clearly wrong; and they stick up for the ref? Happens all the time. Most times I see it the ex-ref on the show is explaining how it is actually not that bad of a decision and how they can see why they've made that decision. It's a piss take. This goes back to my point on how I think the officials these days have a pact. They look after each other. There's nothing wrong with sticking by your mates but in their instance, for me, they come out looking like cowards. Have some accountability. Hold your hand up, have some dignity and admit that they made a mistake. If they did this they would come out with so much more respect and actually more humanity. Managers, coaches, players, people in everyday life make mistakes, and so do referees. Just admit it and stop trying to hide behind one another.
Why is it English Only?
Monday, 24 February 2025
Not Paying These Ticket Prices
Ticket Prices in English Football are Criminal.
Lets be Rafa Benitez for a Minute, Lets Talk About the Facts.
Lets take a look at season ticket prices and have they have changed from the year 2000 to 2010 to this season. First we'll look at the 'big 6' teams in the Premier League: Manchester City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Tottenham Hotspurs and Manchester United.
Manchester City: 2000/01 season £170-£220, 2010/11 season £425-£745, 2024/25 season £675-£915.
Liverpool: 2000/01season £190-£410, 2010/11 season £615-£780, 2024/25 season £685-£890.
Arsenal:2000/01 season £400-880, 2010/11 season £985-£1955, 2024/25 season £875-£1900.
Chelsea: 2000/01 season £240-£575, 2010/11 season £595-£1250, 2024/25 season £675-£1150.
Tottenham Hotspurs: 2000/01 £420-£850, 2010/11 season £880-£1170, 2024/25 season £960-2150.
Manchester United: 2000/01 £175-£540, 2010/11 season £530-£950, 2024/25 season £775-£990.
Just reading some of these numbers makes me feel sick. Forget how good or bad these football teams have been over the past few years. Paying these prices to watch any football is outrageous and to me it is nothing short of exploitation. This is a ticket for 19 home games a season. Some fans will have done this for years and some for even decades. It is the heart and sole of their week to go and watch their team play. I've heard in some conversations that a few people aren't able to go and watch their team play any more. They had been going for years and years but now enough is enough. The prices of tickets have just gotten too high and they can't afford it any more.
When you look at how much prices have gone up on average from the average season ticket price at a club it is around 200%-300% in 25 years. In 25 has the average salary gone up 200%-300%? So how are people going to afford their tickets? they're only able to go if they skimp and change how they spend their money in other aspects of their lives. These fans are showing great loyalty to their clubs and what are they getting back? "Oh your season ticket is going up another 10%-20% for next season. Cheers!"
Across the Touchline on Instagram
Follow on Instagram to keep up with published blogs!
Are These Prices Only For The Top 6 Teams?
Yeah Right... Listen to This.
In the 2023/24 season, Aston Villa qualified for the Champions League for the first time in a long time. It was a long time. For over a decade, Villa hadn't played in Europe since those Martin O'Neil days. Their fans hadn't seen them play against the European giants such as Real Madrid or AC Milan. Some fans weren't even born the last time their team played in a European competition. On their first time back in the big league how does the club celebrate with the fans? They list their ticket prices at £85-£97 for adults. That's per game by the way.
How can this be allowed?
Say for example you're a family of 4. Mum, Dad, son, daughter. The average you're going to pay in 'Zone 2' at Villa Park is £30 each for under-18's and £94 each for Mum and Dad. That's a total of £248 and that's before you've done anything. Not including that travel, food & drink or any merchandise to remember the big game.
Know when the next published blog is by following on X (Twitter)
How often are teams like Newcastle United and Aston Villa going to get into the Champions League these days? This season Nottingham Forest look like they have a good chance of qualifying for the Champions League next season. When was the last time they faced any of the European giants in competition? The Brian Clough days? Then parents are being forced to pay around £250 on tickets for their family.
What is Creating These Sky Rocketed Prices?
To me this is down to the owners of football clubs now. Our football clubs in this country and no longer owned by rich men from the area of that football club who have ties with the area or the club. It's no longer and family owned business by one of the fans. In todays game, our clubs are owned by international wealthy businessmen and women. To them, our pride and joy are a business and that's how they run them. At the end of the day it's all about the cash and the bottom line. Is the club turning a profit at the end of the financial year.
Owners like Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund, Fenway Sports Group, The Glazers, even the owners of the teams further down the league. How many of them do you think have a close affiliation with the club? The club is a business and if it was good for business to sell and leave I don't think they would hesitate.
Most of the teams in the Premier League are owned or part owned by Americans. When we look at American sports and the prices of the tickets there, maybe we can see why tickets in England are becoming so expensive too. For example, in the NFL regular season in 2024 the average adult ticket price was $130 (£104). The average price for a single NBA adult ticket in the regular season is $94 (£76). If you wanted to go to a baseball game last year in the MLB it would cost around $85 (£68). This is for one regular game. If you wanted to go to a play-off game or a finals game the prices sky rocket to $2500+.
I feel this is the way football is going. These clubs; especially the top 6; are being made into franchises. They have poster boys and girls and they are advertised on a global stage to create the highest amount of revenue and the fan doesn't come first.
Isn't This The Way All Football Ticket Prices Are?
Germany is one of the countries where fans can stand and watch football unlike many other countries. This makes ticket prices lower as they can fit more people in. Another thing the German football association and clubs believe in is that sport; including football; needs its fans and it doesn't need to squeeze every last penny out of them.
Looking at the top two teams in the Bundesliga; Bayern Munich and Borussia Dortmund; their season ticket prices are the equivalent of £200. You may have heard of "Fortuna for all" when hearing about Germany football this season. Fortuna Dusseldorf are a Bundesliga 2 team who are planning to have free tickets for all fans in 3 of their home games this season. They are trying to arrange a sponsorship deal that will cover the cost of fans tickets for the next 5 years.
This could work out to be a brilliant concept and bring great atmospheres to the stadium. If it was to be taken up in England's top flight, would it be a negative, cause security issues and more tickets would be given to sponsor executives and corporate suits or would it be a positive giving the opportunity to people who wouldn't normally be able to attend a football match at the top level. In my mind this should definitely being trialled before it is brought to a top league even though I see a lot more positives than negatives. If anything, a price cap needs to be brought in.
The 3pm Blackout.
The Premier League TV deal is worth £6.7 billion and is showing more games than ever. We're decades away from only being able to watch the FA Cups final on TV. Now you can watch some time 6-7 Premier League games per weekend. On top of that there is usually on average 5-6 Football League games on TV a week. Most popularly on Sky Sports or TNT 270 games a season are shown. However, since the 1960's no football game has been shown between 14:30 and 17:15 on a Saturday afternoon. This was brought in to protect the attendance numbers at lower league stadiums.
For the lower league teams around the big Premier League teams, their attendances can be affected depending on if the games overlap each other. For example, in Leeds, fans of Leeds United may go to watch Harrogate Town when Leeds are not playing. If the two West Yorkshire teams have a game at the same time, more fans will choose to attend Elland Road. Even more so, if Leeds United are on TV at the same time as a Town game, the attendance at The Exercise Stadium. I think this could have an effect on ticket prices across England.
If TV companies came together to show all Premier League games at a reasonable price, I think ticket prices would come down too, and then attendances wouldn't be as effected.
All in all, the ticket prices for football games in this country is scandalous. I don't understand how any owner of any football club can feel comfortable charging the average fan so much to go and watch his or her team play. Fans can show immense loyalty to their football club and what is repaid to them after showing decades of support? Ticket prices that are unaffordable in the long run. Things need to change. How come fans can come together and stop the Super League from being created within 48 hours of it being announced? I really think if fans came together again to protest this, the owners would quickly realise that the game is nothing without the fans.
And long live Billy Connolly!
To keep up to date with all things Across the Touchline, follow the blog on either:
Instagram @across_the_touchline or X (Twitter) @ATTouchline
So you never miss the next blog.
Blogs in the near future will be posted on Mondays and don't forget about Across the "Digital" Touchline blogs for all things Fantasy Premier League, posted on Friday's.
Previously on Across the Touchline...
Across the "Digital" Touchline: Fantasy Football *Week 30*
Guess Who's Back Back Again The Premier League's Back Tell a Friend As the Premier League returned after almost 3 weeks; because of ...
-
At the end of the 2024 European Championship Gareth Southgate stepped down as the men's England manager. The big question that football ...
-
The Premier League if it Was On Club Size. The Realisation. Did you realise that there are 12 American owners in the Premier League. This is...
-
Point 1 : Why most teams all over England; regardless of what league they play in; play out from the back even if they have conceded a goal ...